Later, we will examine how , permit, and authorize a multitude of options or expediencies.But, the primary purpose of this article will be to examine the restrictive power of God’s silence in conjunction with the specifics of His revealed pattern.

John Piper is founder and teacher of desiring and chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary.

For 33 years, he served as pastor of Bethlehem Baptist Church, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

All formalization of this oversimplification can create a great opportunity for misunderstanding and hasty dismissal, as evidenced by this opposing comment: If this so-called “law of silence” were to be followed “religiously,” then our PA systems, Powerpoint usage, song books, and other things which we commonly use in worship would all be outlawed. The futility of such a requirement is obvious to even the most casual of Bible students, as evidenced by the above comment.

It really is time to apply some common sense to this “law,” and the way it is applied by so many. It is difficult to know whether the above charge is is aimed deliberately at a straw man or issued in innocence.

Whenever we discover a specific element of the New Testament pattern, how should we interpret the conspicuous absence of further approval or condemnation?

As has often been said, but is still yet worth repeating, the Bible is its own best commentary.

Please take note that if we can find demonstration of someone who was corrected, criticized, or condemned for operating under the presumption that silence inherently permits, then we will have answered our question and eliminated the security of operating under that assumption! How would you react, if you discover God condemning those who presumed upon His silence in instance?

How many instances would be required to change your mind? Many of the following passages have been used as proof-texts for a long time by people from varied denominational backgrounds (for example, John L.

Girardeau of the Columbia Theological Seminary, 1888).

Therefore, please do not be discouraged into thinking that this represents a narrow sect.

Therefore, let us take diligent care to first define all terms, patiently outline the true underlying points of difference, and chart questions that will lead to unity when answered, before arguing the answers.