but her treatise ends before the advent of technology and the impact of emails, cell phones, text messaging, etc. So, while Front Porch shows an interesting and dynamic period in some depth, it is only useful to the reader on that limited basis.PS The final chapter entitled "Scientific Truth..Love" talks about academic elites who "know better" taking over the role of teaching young men and women about romance, sex, and marriage, as well as students controlling curricula in colleges: The modern age demanded scientific techniques, not folk wisdom..."necessary" scientific knowledge became increasingly inaccessible to lay people...

courtship in america dating in the 20th century-86courtship in america dating in the 20th century-90courtship in america dating in the 20th century-64

She draws on a broad range of published sources from popular magazines and college newspapers to academic articles, building a convincing case that a remarkably consistent and coherent set of ideas recurred at every level of public discourse.

She's clear that she's talking about mostly affluent, mostly white, entirely heterosexual norms, but contends, again convincingly, that those norms exerted their influence everywhere.

Excellent monograph tracking the changing contours of courtship behavior from the early 20th century through the mid-Sixties, when the "sexual revolution"--Bailey explains precisely what she means by the term--fundamentally altered the nature of the beast.

The primary change had to do with the movement of courtship from the private sphere of family and home to the public sphere dominated by metaphors of economic exchange.

This book is a short history that explains what happened and makes a credible stab at why it happened.

I understand the reason it is so popular in university history and women's studies classes: It is interesting, informative, and readable. In addition to journal articles, the author supports her writing with quotations f In the space of about three-quarters of a century, courtship in the United States went through at least three different large-scale changes.

It's a great example of how a book doesn't have to be as complicated as most of us make them. Many of my non historian friends read it before I did, and recommended it to me. This book was a great combination of fabulous scholarship mixed with intensely readable prose.

The subject matter is of interest to anyone, but despite my having read plenty of social history books about the 20s/30s and the post-WWII era, I was fascinated to contrast the pre and post WWII eras.

At last I have some solid retorts for my grandfather who insists that women's lib in the 1970s 'ruined' men.